|
|
This site is not hosted in the United Kingdom for legal reasons. To use an internet site off shore does not give immunity to libel litigation and the people that are named on this site are invited to take the author / publisher to court in England if they feel that they have a case. All of the data on this site is a true account, and it is hoped that the Internet host will support this site, keep this site live, as a forerunner of such sites to eradicate global government / corporate harassment / oppression.
Ipswich Borough Council's crooked legal team will try to put pressure on the host to kill this site. Hopefully, the host will keep this site live.
The people that are named on this site, Ipswich Borough Council employees, and x employees, and other parties. If they consider the content of this site to be libellous, these people need to start legal proceedings now before the book " The fiddle " is published in paper using the photographs and the content of this internet site as a reference.
The author would like to sue James Hehir C.E.O. I.B.C. for being collusive to harassment, and David Ball, the X leader of Ipswich Borough Council collectively, also, for not carrying out their professional duties which was to be the head lifeguards for the Ipswich people and to respond to my letters of safety concern. If Hehir and Ball had done their jobs the author would have had no reason to call to see David Ball at his home, and none of the events at the time and thereafter would have happened, particularly my mental negation, almost to suicide by the criminal court case hearings and the whole of this alarming event as chronicled in the book " The Fiddle " posted on this internet site. I want to sue for compensation for this long period serious mental impairment, ( not delusory !!! ) If there is a standard declaration that council leaders make when they take office for him / her to protect the general public, I would like to sight it. Any lawyer that offers help, this would have to be on a no win no fee agreement. Any legal advice offered from any source would be helpful, this must be free and be in writing.
All the information on this site is truthful and exact, If the author / publisher is prosecuted for libel by any of the people referred to on this site then any part of this site that is considered incorrect and libelous by a judge / court will have to be removed by a court order. Where resignations are asked for the author / publisher asks these people to resign or see him in court to answer the allegations.
The publisher / author, will try to gain as much publicity as possible from such a court hearing. There is a pile of H.S.E. letters. Newspaper articles, and other recorded delivery support letters that can be produced in court to validate the authors / publishers claims.
Many of the letters that are referred to in fiddle-1 etc. were sent recorded delivery to the recipients. The recorded number for each letter is recorded at the top of the letter, the data base for these letters is kept by necessary agents.
If the content on this site is contested and the matter goes to the High Court the author will ask for the Judge to award court costs if possible personally against James Hehir or I.B.C. or I.B.C. appointed agents, or I.B.C. staff and X staff as listed in the resignations list. Hehir has plenty of money and property. Hehir and his council officers have not done their job which is to be the Chief lifeguards for Ipswich town and have good credibility I.B.C. have not done their job over the years which is to be professional in their lifeguard / care duties and other matters. The author / publisher will ask for travelling costs and harassment compensation if this matter goes to court. The authors costs claim in this respect do not constitute any part of any settlement claim for the alleged I.B.C. harassment published on this internet site.
Over the last ten years Ipswich Borough Councils legal department has amassed piles of paper work that pertain to the claims on this site, there are locally published leaflets created and distributed by the author, and many letters. This poses the question, If this data is scurrilous, why have I not been prosecuted before now for publishing such data locally ?
Ipswich Borough Council's legal department recently sent me a pile of paper work that they considered was to their advantage, I see the reverse in that most of the paper work was date stamped I.B.C. This poses the question, why have I not been prosecuted before now for sending out such paper work and leaflets ?
Photography. Permission is normally asked for photography of proprietors buildings / plant. The photography on this site is for the promotion of the sports facility, to keep this much loved local treasure open as an on going concern. Some of the photography is for public safety awareness / enhancement. As the photography is for public safety / public happiness promotion, and does not include the photography of personnel, it is assumed that as the current leader of Ipswich Borough Council stated in a published news article that he was for the promotion / keeping of the Broom Hill pool open, it is also assumed that the council leader is pro public safety. It is also assumed there will no objection to the publication of such safety awareness / happiness promotion, published photographic evidence. This promotional photography will only be removed by a court order. The publisher will seek as much publicity for the retention of the Broom Hill pool from such a hearing.
The photography on this internet site of the Broom Hill pool is a public record for a public owned building, this is an important historic grade two listed twentieth century art deco lido pool. There are many people around the world that are interested in looking at descriptive photographic evidence of such architecture. For this reason if this photographic material publication goes to court to be removed by Ipswich Borough Council from this internet site, hopefully H.H. the Judge will allow the photographic material to be retained on this site for this purpose.
James Hehir C.E.O. I.B.C. wrote to me threatening to prosecute me this year for publishing material that he claimed as far as he was concerned was defamatory. This caused me to draft letter 1, and send the letter to the people as listed in this letter 1. Please refer to the letters section to read letter 1, I have not heard further from James Hehir or his solicitors about this letter, why ?
In 1999. The H.S.E. and the sports council recommended that artistic / acrobatic high board and spring board diving is not allowed at public usage times in swimming pools with such facilities, however, this is discretionary, the management set the risk. There was no such recommendation before 1999.
Ipswich Borough Councils legal department threatened libel action and to make me bankrupt for the publication of this internet site and book, My recorded delivery letter reply is published below.
A.W.JOHNS
34 BISHOPS HILL RECORDED DELIVERY.
IPSWICH SUFFOLK
IP3 8EN. RB 8294 6087 5GB
DATED 21 09 2002
REF C:\02\02142.TXT
To Mr. Paul Turner
The legal Department
Ipswich Borough Council
Civic Centre
Civic Drive
Ipswich.
ip1 2ee.
Dear Mr. Turner. Thank you for your letter dated 30 Aug 02.
Re: paragraph two. The material on the C.D. Rom is exact and
truthful of past event, I do not see any slander in the material.
Re: paragraph three. I feel that my prior publications, that your
legal department and your council are aware of without starting an
action against me must be taken in to account.
Thank you for pointing out my lying to the police, in 1993 an
I.B.C. council manager lied to the police in his police statement.
Your council leader lied to the police in 1996 in his police
statement, In 1992 John Ward your then swimming pools manager
lied to me in recorded telephone conversations, this activity
seems vogue. Your council officers lying may be proved in court.
Re: paragraph four. Mr. Hehir's position with Solace. I have
checked this matter with Mike Pitt the current president of
solace, the terms of office are twelve months, any reference to
this on this ipswichswimmingpools site has been removed.
Thank you for threatening to make me bankrupt for exposing your
labour council's skulduggery. I am without funds to appoint a
solicitor for legal matters pertinent to this web site.
It would take a lot of money for such legal work and possibly
months of letter writing to you by a solicitor with all sorts of
delays.
I want to publish soon to make the public aware of your past and
current sloppy management of your swimming pools. This I view as
very serious. I feel that the legal matters pertinent to libel
need to be queried and addressed if necessary with your legal
department as they are relevant to your past and present councils
action.
I feel that this web site needs to be published as this
site is within the public's interests in that there is local
government dictatorial oppression, these public safety issues,
harassment of the public, theft from the public by denying them
of paid for services that they where used to, a hypothesis of
tricks that can be used to close a much loved public facility,
a cover up by council employees that have conspired against an
individual to stop the publication of serious safety neglect and
harassment at their swimming pools.
I think that you will agree that Council legal departments
should not be collusive to covering up local government public
safety and public harassment oppressive behaviour.
I and the public do not expect collusion from the bottom to the
top of local government including it's legal department to stop
a member of the public that was highlighting serious safety
problems to be harassed and excluded from their premises by
officers that where aware of the harassment and to stop the on
going publication of unsafe matters.
I have been working on this web site this week, a
current copy is enclosed, I would like you to go through this
data and present me with a list of areas from the data that you
feel are libelous and that may be brought up in court.
This exercise is to protect tax payers money that could be spent
on legal costs in a libel court case, I feel, and I think you
will agree, that valuable tax payers money needs to be protected,
and the costs of your department perusing the data will be
considerably lessor than any court costs, and it is your public
duty to help expose council corruption and safety neglect, and to
save on the costs of council's legal expenses and legal
departments expenditure.
The way I see it, the council are in fault, a judge reading this
web site, the H.S.E. letters that show serious neglect
and lack of care for the general public, and the illustrated
pictures of the disgusting diving boards in 1993, 2002,
mostly used by children at one of your numerous mismanaged
facilities, together with the pattern that I was banned from your
premises after two newspaper safety publications, and a safety
meeting with hierarchal council officers.
I would expect the judge seeing that I have no money, but also
seeing serious unsafe matters and collusion to cover up same
by your council, I would think that the judge would place court
costs to the council. I am prepared to risk this to publish to
get rid of your garbage management, and quickly protect the
unwary general public.
Please let me have a list of points that you consider libelous
within fourteen days for my perusal, If I do not get a reasonable
reply, after this time period, I will set the site live for
global publication. I want to set a precedent, where the man
without funds can fight corruption and dictatorial oppression
endangering the public by the launching of a web site quite
cheaply to make the public aware of such matters, and to put the
ball squarely in the court of the oppressive party where the
oppressor has to go public and sue if he has a case.
I enclose H.S.E. and other paper work for unsafe faults at your
swimming pools 1992, 1993, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002.
Thank you for your letter dated 18 September 2002. The extension
of my ban from your leisure centres was a foregone conclusion,
this was expected by me. Your labour council does not want a
roving publishing safety expert to see the dangers at your
facilities and publish same.
I am,
YOURS SINCERELY
TONY JOHNS
A.S.A. diving instructor registered 1407.
Enc, 1. This web site on a CD ROM disk.
Enc, 2. The 1992 news article pertinent to Broom Hill safety.
Enc, 3. The 1993 H.S.E. letter from John Claxton.
Enc, 4. The 1999 H.S.E. letters pertinent to Broom Hill and
Crown pools safety. 4th. November - 15th November - 6th October
from Basingstoke.
Enc, 5. The 2002 H.S.E. letter 15 July from Basingstoke.
I received a reply from Mr. Turner to the letter above, the
points that he raised in his assessment that where defamatory
where,
1. That he has advised Ipswich Borough Council that my proposed
web site is defamatory of employees and councillors of
Ipswich Borough council.
2. That, your repeated statements, that the council wants to close
the Broom Hill pool for improper motives.
3. That, your repeated statements, that the council have carried out
dirty tricks to get the Broom Hill pool closed.
4. That, your repeated statements, that people where trying to
kill an innocent member of the public.
5. That, your repeated statements, that the Broom Hill pool was
unsafe.
6. That the H.S.E. would have closed the Broom Hill pool had
they thought the pool was unsafe.
The publishers / authors reply letter is published below. The
publisher / author thought the way forward was to do what the
council does, just post the relevant data in an inconspicuous
place on a site somewhere.
A.W.JOHNS
34 BISHOPS HILL
IPSWICH SUFFOLK
IP3 8EN.
DATED 25 11 2002
REF C:\02\02145.TXT
To Mr. Paul Turner.
Acting Head Of Legal Services,
I.B.C,s legal department
Ipswich Borough Council
The Civic Centre,
Civic Drive,
Ipswich
Suffolk.
Ip1 2ee.
The ipswichswimmingpools.com web site has not been set live
while I researched
the libel aspect and took free legal advice, and consultancy
advice in a further area. I have however set the site live today,
my hereto internet published response refers to the points raised
in your recent letter,
I have not defamed I.B.C. employees, my site and book content
is truthful and exact. Unfortunately some of I.B.C. employees
are crooked, collusive, conspiratorial, to protect the very
crooked element of your council.
Please Note. That I do not deliberately defame or upset honest
people. Re, the collusion Booty and Frieth, and presumably others
that caused the false police statements to try to get me falsely
imprisoned in 1996. I have no reason to name these council
officers and the event than to expose their crooked skulduggery,
I don't doubt for one moment that I.B.C. could conspire to put
many executive officers ( and the local vicar ) in court to
state that Booty and Frieth could not act in such a way.
Please bear in mind that if I.B.C. members past and present
collude to lie to sue me for libel, if they lose they will have
to foot the bill, equally so, with the phenomenal costs involved
in such an action, this could also make them bankrupt.
My assessment is, that local government officers, that in
collaboration get this feeling of invincibility, and that this
feeling of invincibility makes them not accountable and above
the law.
In reply to the points you raised,
1. I feel the council wants to close broom Hill swimming pool at
the moment because 1. it presents a risk of embarrassment for the
publication of the unsafe management of the pool. I.B.C,s track
record for the last ten years proves this. 2. There are other
reasons, some of which are recorded on this internet site.
2. The skulduggerous methods that a council can use to close a
swimming pool are now listed as an hypothesis to be published on
my internet site.
3. I suspected management where trying to kill an unwary member
of the public in 1995, The then Council Leader David Ball verbally
confirmed this in 1996 as chronicled in the book " The Fiddle "
this skulduggery seriously negated my mental state, Ball's
disclosure needs to be published. Ball of course will deny this.
4. The H.S.E. provides a safety guide book for swimming pools
operators, to adhere to these guide lines is deemed to be a
professional pool operator. To not adhere to the guide lines
increases the risk of accident or death for the generally
unwary general public, This makes the pool dangerous for public
use. I have repeatedly written to I.B.C. officers about neglect
as far as these guide lines are concerned, the H.S.E. also made
safety recommendations that where ignored. Your council has
often not acted quickly upon H.S.E. recommended safety advice
by myself or the H.S.E. This has always resulted in force,
remedial order, or further meetings with the H.S.E. to address
the problems.
To be told to address a serious safety problem in 1994 by the
H.S.E. and the problem was not addressed until 1999, you say
the council has always addressed safety issues as soon as
possible, this statement says it all. If the H.S.E. makes a
recommendation and this is not adhered to, and as a result a
person dies, the neglectful body will usually face manslaughter
charges. My Site highlights the fact that the H.S.E. in my
assessment are to cosy with linked government corporates, had this
situation been different I am sure the H.S.E. would have issued
further remedial orders, or, on occasion would
have closed the Broom Hill pool, or parts of it. I reiterate,
other swimming pools that I use / have used mostly in East Anglia,
are very professionally run.
This year, 2002, I made necessary safety recommendations to your
council, pertinent to the Broom Hill pool, these safety
recommendations where not implemented. This resulted in me calling
in the H.S.E again, the H.S.E. asked I.B.C. to increase
chlorination levels and to repaint the bottom of the Broom Hill
pool that had dangerously deteriorated, ( went black ), because
it was not effectively chlorine treated or cleaned.
It,s publication time, all the data on the site is true, the site
was set live today, If your crooked collusive council officers
sue me for libel then it's time for their public examination.
This needs to be to protect the general public from an
oppressive regime that does not support public safety,
( your local government ).
Lying in police statements as all the parties have including
myself is not an offence, to lie in court under oath is a
different matter and is unlawful, and is taboo, and if caught
out, usually
results in a custodial sentence, If these matters goes to court
as a libel action, I shall be taking steps to make sure all of
the parties involved are aware of this and the penalties.
The way your council ( local government ) has acted from the
bottom to the top is a public outrage, these acts of harassment
of the general public, conspiracy to kill an unwary member of
the public cannot go unpublished.
I look forward to seeing your collusive skulduggerous council
officers, past and present, in court for their public examination,
If matters take this course. This public accountability is long
overdue and was unfortunately missed with the David Ball hearings.
If this matter goes to court, I will elect for trial by jury, and
ask for the whole saga as chronicled in the site and
the book " the fiddle " to be examined by the Judge and Jury if
this is possible.
I have great faith in the British Justice system, I have found
this process the most fair and professional to date, If this
matter goes to court I feel sure my honesty will be recognised.
I hope that this letter further clarifies matters,
I am,
YOURS SINCERELY
TONY JOHNS
Often the psychologists negate a brain, the new adaptation is then seen by the psychologists and is assumed that they have dug deeper in to the victims brain and detected relevant data, this is of course not the case, the psychologists have just corrupted the victims brain to the negative, they can then record the data and then locally publish the result.
Any person qualified or not can currently set up psychology tests in public places and locally publish their assessments. This practise can be used maliciously to drive people to serious mental negation, even to suicide. Corporates can easily fund this activity to their political advantage. All persons that carry out such activity should be licensed, and a summary of their daily work entered on a national computer data base, hopefully under the control of the psychological society. This data base would hold data pertinent to the funding of such testing. This data base could only be accessed by professionals, police, psychiatrists, lawyers.
All other unlicensed field psychological testing should be unlawful with serious custodial penalties. Also, any publication of data to none professionals should be unlawful, and in fault therefore carry serious custodial sentences. In time this whole current field psychological testing scenario may be deemed so unreliable and negating for people as to not have any credibility, and hopefully will be completely outlawed. For further details of this, please read the reward page on this site and the free e-book - The Cesspool And The Secret Armies.
In May 2006 Ipswich Borough Council tried to close down one of my sites in America. Details of this legal issue are published below.
(C) A.W.JOHNS 2006
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. SENT RECORDED DELIVERY
A.W.JOHNS. DK 9329 4861 2GB
34 BISHOPS HILL,
IPSWICH,
SUFFOLK,
IP3 8EN.
DATED. 09 05 06
REF. 06/0628.TXT
MR. PAUL TURNER.
JOINT SENIOR LAWYER
THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT
IPSWICH BOROUGH COUNCIL
IPSWICH SUFFOLK.
IP1 2EE
This letter was sent by letter post to MR. Paul Turner at the
address above and by E-mail to Mr. Paul Turner.
E-mail link = paul.turner@ipswich.gov.uk
SUBJECT. Child abuse, psychological and physical, upon children,
( minors ). and adults: by a parent and parents that lawfully
should have acted otherwise.
The heads of local government departments and their legal
advisers in Ipswich are the head lifeguards for our queens
people in Ipswich. The paramount duty of these lifeguards is
to protect our queens people. Some of these lifeguards reneged
on this duty. The alarming concern is that they endangered the
lives of children and harassed them.
These people and their subordinates had the legal obligation
to be parent to many children: they did not implement this
legal obligation. I, Anthony Johns had to take over as lifeguard,
and parent, to ensure that many children were made safe.
CLAIM. A claim of five million pounds GBP ( sterling) is made
as compensation for this unbelievable unlawful behaviour against
the perpetrators: this is members of Ipswich Borough Council
situate in Ipswich Suffolk in the United Kingdom.
I, Anthony William Johns, of, 34 Bishops Hill, Ipswich require
a response to this letter from the Ipswich Borough Councils
joint head lawyer, a Mr. Paul Turner. If the response from this
letter is not seen by myself as satisfactory then I shall
present evidence to Ipswich County Court in the respect of the
further recent harassment of recent correspondence from Mr.
Paul Turner highlighted in this letter: and a synopsis of the
unwarranted harassment causing serious mental impairment
imposed upon me by Ipswich Borough Councils officers and their
agents since 1992. The object of this harassment was to drive
me to suicide: to stop my truthful publications.
I will be asking the Judge at Ipswich County Court, or any
county court that I wish to use to peruse the evidence of the
claims that you Paul Turner have made recently made pertinent
in an e-mail sent to Rackspace, a company that is a DNS provider,
this is the company that has authority over my memetic1.com
web site: where a true account of Ipswich Borough Councils
skulduggery is published.
I will be claiming one hundred pounds compensation for this
recent act of skulduggery by you and from you personally, Mr.
Paul Turner, as a small token payment: common for such a county
court in the respect only of this recent harassment. The Judge
in his / her infinite wisdom and discretion may decide this
token compensation claim is inadequate and increase it
accordingly.
This token claim in no way satisfies in any part the main claim
of five million pounds that the judge may feel it is his duty to
refer the whole matter to a higher court where all the evidence
from subpoenaed witnesses can be heard in respect of this full
claim.
If you Paul Turner do not attend this hearing, with the judges
permission: I will read this letter in court to record the truth
of my claims before this judge. The judge however may have the
power to subpoena you to court to answer my questions, and may
act accordingly.
If there is a court case at a higher level, the Judge may
feel the need to increase the five million pounds compensation
claim against you Mr. Paul Turner, and or your council, or any
specific officers, for your previous harassing misconduct.
I reserve the right to start a separate action against James
Hehir, at any future time, the Chief Executive Officer at
the moment: at Ipswich Borough council for his part in this
long term unwarranted dictatorial harassment of me, or any other
Ipswich Borough Council officers that have harassed me.
You and your council have kept me out of your sports centres to
try and stop me finding out your further corporate skulduggery.
An undated copy of an e-mail that you recently sent to Rackspace
that besmirched me is pasted below. Global Host are legally
connected to Rackspace.
--------------------------------------------------------
-Edgar Madrid-
GlobalHost.com
Tony,
Here is the complaint that was submitted to our DNS providor.
Dear Sirs
1.
I am writing about the website www.memetic1.com which according to a
WHOIS search is hosted by Rackspace.
2.
I believe that it violates the Rackspace acceptable use policy
(http://www.rackspace.com/aboutus/legal/aup.php ) by promoting child
abuse and it is libellous.
3.
I am the senior lawyer for the municipality of Ipswich, Great Britain. The
memetic1.com site belongs to someone who has been banned from public
swimming facilities in Ipswich owing to his inappropriate behaviour toward
minors. This site (particularly, but not exclusively, the page
http://www.memetic1.com/book2.asp and the associated downloadable file (
http://www.memetic1.com/book/Bk2.zip ) seeks to explain and excuse his
conduct and sexual relationships with minors. It is also defamatory of
Ipswich Borough Council.
Please will you remove this site from your systems.
Paul Turner
Corporate Legal Adviser
Ipswich Borough Council
T +44 1473 432311
F +44 1473 432326
-------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Paragraph 2.
My memetic1.com web site does not promote child abuse, there is
no libel to any person or organisation on the site.
Re: Paragraph 3.
1. You are not the senior lawyer at Ipswich Borough council, you
are joint senior lawyer with Clare Barritt.
2. Inappropriate behaviour with youngsters is approaching
youngsters for sex or abusing them, this never happened. I had
used IBC facilities for 15 years before 1992. There were never any
problems until 1992 when I called in the local newspaper to view
the dangerous swimming pool. An article was published in the local
newspaper. I was harassed threatened and intimidated by staff and
by an aggressive IBC employed thug on the pool side.
Offers of sex from highly promiscuous children was never taken up
by me, this however caused fantasy masturbation, this is briefly
chronicled in the book Surrogate Daughter that I sent to IBC CEO
James Hehir. This is the primary reason for my ban. My research
has proved that most men have a sexual attraction to such
children, but like me: they keep such sexual urges well under
control.
I have never used a sports venue for sexual gratification
purposes. I can use all sports venues and all other venues locally
and globally. I have never been on a sexual register or
interviewed by any person for alleged sexual assault or sexual
harassment.
The book Surrogate Daughter is not an excuse for behaviour. This
book is a science book that defines scientifically the love
mutually generated between myself and this child to protect and
project as a surrogate daughter. The book is set against a true
account of the skulduggery of Ipswich Borough Councils appointed
officers. There is no libel in the book. The book does not promote
child abuse.
The book shows how love stupefies brains. Quote from Woody Allen
when he fell in love with his stepdaughter, " There's nothing
I can do, I fell in love ". My book qualifies this mental
destabilization in scientific analyses and general account.
If you do not respond to this letter Mr. Paul Turner, I reserve the
right for you to answer the following questions in a court of law if
I can find a judge that will hear this case.
You will have to produce evidence for your claims in paragraphs
2. and 3. of the e-mail that you sent to Rackspace. I will
question you on these claims.
There are two letters and support text on my
www.ipswichswimmingpools.com web site legal page where I will
require answers to questions.
Link = http://www.ipswichswimmingpools.com/legal.htm
The letters and support text are appended to this letter.
Ipswich police raided my house and took my computers for analyses,
there was no adult or child pornography on my machines, I am not
in to that. The only dirty images on my machines are displayed on
my Ipswich swimming pools site. These pictures show dangerous
apparatus that children were using and being hurt using this
apparatus. This was unlawful action by Ipswich Borough Council
endangering the lives and causing injury pain and suffering to
some children. This was uncaring child abuse, other personal
harassment was further adult and child abuse.
Link = http://www.ipswichswimmingpools.com/pics-6.htm
My dealings with Ipswich Borough Council have kept me in a poor
mental state for most of the last 13 years. My recent science book
published on the internet is four years behind creation and
publication because of Ipswich Borough Councils agents harassment.
I am in negotiation with a publisher for this book to be published
as a paperback.
Link. = http://www.exact-psychology.com
This recent action against one of my publications is just pure
harassment as retribution for my recent warranted attack on
James Hehir, I know that the last thing you want is publicity
with a court case about this matter.
link = http://www.anobeisworthless.com
References = Books, Art.
1. Programming Basic For Eternal Life.
2. Surrogate Daughter.
3. The Valfet Audio Amplifier
4. The Fiddle.
5. The Cesspool And The Secret Armies.
6. Am I Just A Programmed Organic Machine?
7. Patent Application 0608214.3 April 2006
8. About 200 letters of correspondence to Ipswich Borough Council
regards safety and harassment issues.
9. Numerous letters of correspondence with the H.S.E. and replies
including a letter of commendation: for making the Broomhill
swimming pool very safe.
10. ASA registered diving instructor. 1407
The Surrogate Daughter court case is published in the Surrogate
Daughter Book publication. The judge referring to both parties
stated " that it was a sad case ". The small fine was to cover
costs only.
The Rollerking court case publication, there was no fine, the
Judge read the Surrogate Daughter book, he could see that the
book was an evolving science book. I was banned from Rollerking,
however, upon application, I was allowed to use the sports
venue again, I can still use this venue if I wish.
link = http://www.ipswichswimmingpools.com/negative.htm
As a scientist I like to set precedents. Within possibly five
years there will be accurate portable lie detection machines.
If I state in court that you or any Ipswich Borough Council
Officer is lying, I will ask that when such lie detection
apparatus is available that any officer in dispute can be
subpoenaed back to court for further interrogation with
such apparatus and in fault a custodial sentence and loss
of personal assets and compensation will be asked for and
applied.
Equally so, the same process, with equal penalty, will be
applied to myself.
Any reply to this letter addressed to me should be constructed
in simple to understand English in the same manner as this
letter is constructed.
I am in the process of setting links with descriptive text on
the pertinent page of my memetic1.com web site to the
ipswichswimmingpools.com web site and this letter.
As a child I was severely bullied, this makes me fight bullies
like you and Ipswich Borough Council officers in any way that
I can. Unfortunately with my fundamental childhood programming,
as described in my books, this can make me violent, particularly
when I see children hurt. I do not intend any further violence.
Please reply within seven days to avoid further possible action.
I am,
Yours Sincerely.
Tony Johns.
APPENDAGES.
Below are appended the recent e-mail communications pertinent to
Ipswich Borough Council trying to close down my memetic1.com web
site.
From: "tony johns"
To: "Edgar Madrid"
Subject: Re: memetic1.com
Date: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:20 AM
Hi, Edgar, I am just about to leave for a weekend away,
I decided to check my e-mails before I left.
My battle with Paul Turner goes back a long way,
this is maliscous. Thanks for the e-mail, I was not
banned from IBC premises for for inappropriate behaviour with children. I
was banned primarily for
sending IBC the book that is on your site that highlights
their corporate skulduggery, and physically attacking
their officers for harassing me. I am not banned from
any other venues in Ipswich or globally.
I am not on any sexual offenders registers, I have never
sexually offended,
Paul Turners corporate skulduggery is highlighted in a letter on the legal
page of my ipswichswimmingpools web site
http://www.ipswichswimmingpools.com/legal.htm
This page has not changed for 3 years. Turner has taken no action over my
ipswichswimmingpools site. that he was made aware of by me 3 years ago.
I will get back to you on Monday regards this matter.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Edgar Madrid"
To: "tony johns"
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: memetic1.com
> Tony,
>
> Here is the complaint that was submitted to our DNS providor.
>
> Dear Sirs
>
> I am writing about the website www.memetic1.com which according to a WHOIS
> search is hosted by Rackspace.
>
> I believe that it violates the Rackspace acceptable use policy
> http://www.rackspace.com/aboutus/legal/aup.php ) by promoting child abuse
> and it is libellous.
>
> I am the senior lawyer for the municipality of Ipswich, Great Britain. The
> memetic1.com site belongs to someone who has been banned from public
> swimming facilities in Ipswich owing to his inappropriate behaviour toward
> minors. This site (particularly, but not exclusively, the page
> http://www.memetic1.com/book2.asp and the associated downloadable file
> http://www.memetic1.com/book/Bk2.zip ) seeks to explain and excuse his
> conduct and sexual relationships with minors. It is also defamatory of
> Ipswich Borough Council.
>
> Please will you remove this site from your systems.
>
> Paul Turner
> Corporate Legal Adviser
> Ipswich Borough Council
>
> T +44 1473 432311
> F +44 1473 432326
>
> Please let me know how you would like to respond to that.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Edgar-
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "tony johns"
> To: "Edgar Madrid"
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:50 PM
> Subject: Re: memetic1.com
>
>
> > Hi, Edgar, sorry to trouble you again, I have taken a
> > a look at the text on my Surrogate Daughter page (bk2)
> > I have not looked at this for some time.
> >
> > The text is quite explicit, it warns people of the pitfalls
> > of mixing socially with young people, particularly older people that are
> > in
> > contact with young people, carers, social workers etc, this is also the
> > purpose of this book.
> >
> > Please get back to me on this, Kind Regards, Tony
> > Johns.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Edgar Madrid"
> > To:
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 7:11 PM
> > Subject: memetic1.com
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Anthony,
> >>
> >> We have gotten complaints from our DNS provider, that there is
> > questionable
> >> material on the website of memetic1.com. They have said it looks like
to
> > be
> >> a story about the author 'falling in love' with a teenage girl.
> >> http://www.memetic1.com/book2.asp
> >>
> >> Please let me know what you are willing to do about the situation.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> -Edgar Madrid-
> >> GlobalHost.com
> >>
> >
 |